20 Aug 2010

Honda's rise and fall, or, how our favorite carmaker went from making the S2000 to making the Crosstour

Posted by:  John Shen

(three Hondas we love)

We really like Honda, we really want to like Honda. They've made some of (all of our) favorite cars in history, like the CRX Si, the Prelude, Harvey's new Integra, the Civic Si, the last gen TL. We love how it's an engineering run company. (How could you not love a company that trumps the nerdy acronym "VTEC" as one of their core technologies?). We love the fact that they're born from a pedigree of motorcycle racing and have carried over that DNA into all of their products.

However, recently, we can't help but notice their recent fall from grace. with a string of terrible products (for example, the transformation of the TL from one of the best to one of the worst looking cars on the road, the release of the crosstour as the wagon no one wanted or wants to look at, the CRZ and it's terrible compromise between not sporty and not efficient).

These are what I think the problems are with Honda:

 1) They've gotten too focus grouped. More and more, their cars feel like compromises. A Camry is terrible because every single aspect of the car feels like it's been designed by committee. The Accord is becoming frighteningly similar.

2) Some of their cars are just really questionable. Case in point: the ZDX, it's like an MDX, but less useful. Honda, just because BMW has problems with making cars that no one wants doesn't mean you need to follow their lead.

3) What is their core values as a company? We don't really know: Is it having a good mild hybrid system? No: Toyota has gotten that crown. Is it having VTEC? No, fewer and fewer cars have that now. Is it having the sportiest lineup of vehicles you can buy with an ordinary budget? No, Honda lost that when the S2000 died and the CRZ gained a hybrid drive. Besides, Mazda's got that cornered and marketed. Is it value? No, Hyundai has got that cornered tightly. On the other hand, the competitors have pretty clearly demarcated niches: Toyota/Lexus with reliability, Mazda/Infiniti with sportiness, Buick/Lexus with softness. What exactly, then, is a Honda/Acura suppose to be?

People don't buy cars on the premise that they look ridiculous, and the company may have a reputation for reliability alone. You don't want to be the alternative to the Camry because, honestly, most people will just buy the Camry.

4) They play too much "me too". Case in point. the Insight. Let's not forget Honda started the whole Hybrid movement with the brilliant first gen insight. It wasn't much, but it was revolutionary. However, the new Insight looks just like a clone of the Prius. Maybe they thought that was the recognizable shape for a hybrid these days, maybe it really is the only good aerodynamic solution (I doubt this in my professional capability as an engineer). Regardless of the reason they look similar, people think of the Insight as "Honda's Prius", despite the fact that Honda pioneered the technology. Not good.

5) Polarizing design: How could I let up on bashing the hideousness of Acura's (and Honda's) recent design philosophy. Sure, it's bold, it's edgy, but it's damn ugly. Daring design doesn't have to be digesting. See Bangle  of BMW for example. Even though people hated his designs initially, within a few years everyone warmed up to them. No one has warmed up to the Acura eagle-beak yet. Mazda replaced the facade on their entire lineup with their new and questionable looking smiley face motif. It makes a few cars look terrible (see: 2011 Mazda 5) but at least it's consistent. Above all, unlike the Acura/Honda facelifts of late, the Mazda ones don't look rushed and cheap.

So, what's Honda to do? Growing a pair of balls would be nice. There's no reason to neuter your only dedicated "sports car" with a hybrid as they've done with the CRZ. You may claim that it's the technology of the future. You may claim that all sports cars are going to look like this. But you know it's not true. (just take one look at the Tesla Roadster and tell me that I'm wrong about hybrid sports cars). It's not a good idea. By trying to placate both the sports car market and the hybrid market, they've made a car that's not that great at either.

This is Honda's problem as a company these days. By trying to be all things to all people. They really are resigning themselves to a future of being a perennial also-ran.

I really hope I'm wrong

(three Hondas we hate)

Photos copyright Middle Class Motoring
5 Aug 2010

One way to patch a boo-boo

Posted by:  John Shen

This might be starting to be a regular trend for us. Spot your local ridiculous Honda.

This one comes as a contribution of one of our readers. There are many things one could do to remedy a fender bender. patch the paint yourself, get a bumper cover, take it to a shop to get repainted, take it to your buddy Big Al to get it repainted

However, doing what the above (might I add, highly creative) person did, would not be the first thing to come to your mind as a possibility.

Sure, it looks pretty ridiculous, but on second thought, doesn't this make sense? A lot of us already personify and think of our cars like a member of our family, why not extend that mental connection to caring for it like it actually was a member of the family...

No wait... nevermind, it's just ridiculous

29 Jul 2010

I know we harp on about Americans not actually needing SUVs, but this is ridiculous

Posted by:  John Shen

Look, not everyone needs a Ford Explorer, or a GMC Yukon, or even an Acura MDX to drive themselves to work every day. I mean, if you're not moving furniture all the time, even a small car like my Golf GTI coupe can fit two bikes in the back seat, or a couple of snowboards and gear (I've done both those with ease). It's pretty clear that most people in the US buy for their maximum possible size need, oblivious to the fact that if they just rented a van for $20 the one day they do need to move a couch a year, this'll save them much more money the other 364 days of the year.

That said, there is a point where the opposite is true. Take this fine gentlemen's car (stereotyping on gender here, but you know I'm probably right). Yes, not everyone needs an SUV. Yes, most people with SUVs don't use them at all...

But when you've actually got gear to carry on what seems like a regular basis (enough to prompt installing roof racks for the ladder on the integra).... Dude, just buy a freaking SUV or wagon, or rent one.

Middle Class Motoring

Normal Cars, Normal? Guys.

Car reviews for the rest of us.

Website powered by 87 octane and our friends at Posterous!

Tags

  • reviews (28)
  • Honda (3)
  • WTF (2)
  • BMW (1)
  • diesel (1)
  • mercedes (1)